Q&A: Twin Cities Foreclosure Information

I often get questions on where to find information on foreclosure properties in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area.  Here are a few free resources that you can refer to:

Hennepin County Foreclosures

Dakota County Foreclosures

Search Foreclosures and Short Sales currently for sale

Unfortunately the other counties have not become user-friendly enough to post their sheriff sales onlines… I really wish they would.  I regularly reference Hennepin County’s data for myriad reasons and I’m sure I’m not the only one.  It’s public data… make it public!

There are other resources for foreclosure information (foreclosures.com, etc. but I have found their data quality to be far less than desired).

Minneapolis/St. Paul MLS Addresses Foreclosures & Short Sales… Kinda

The RMLS of Minnesota, which is the governing body of the MLS in the Twin Cities and is owned by the 4 local REALTOR associations, has made some policy changes in regards to the reporting of foreclosures on the MLS, effective on Thursday:

The “In Foreclosure/Lender Owned?” field:

  • Initially will be an agent-only field (not available on Customer reports or on public Web sites through Broker Reciprocity).
  • Options are: Yes, No and Not Disclosed
  • For NorthstarMLS, Foreclosure is defined as the homeowner being served official notice of foreclosure by a governing entity (does not include notice of default from the lender when payments are late).
  • If you select Yes, you certify that you have permission from the seller to disclose that the property is in foreclosure.
  • This field is being added in response to the large increase in foreclosure status properties and agents desire to more easily search them when the seller has agreed to disclose it.  Our goal is to initially keep this information on the MLS simple and rely on agents to communicate with each other regarding the details.
  • If you edit an existing listing after the implementation, you will be required to complete these fields before saving the listing.

While I applaud RMLS’s efforts on this issue, it seems to me that they’re missing much of the issue.  This new policy ignores the following:

Houses Listed as Short Sales on the MLS
These houses are listed at a price where they have negative equity at the closing table and the seller has no financial ability to pay the difference so the seller is asking their lender(s) to take less than they are owed (a “short pay” or “short sale”) as payment in full.  In many circumstances a house is listed on the MLS as a short sale far before official foreclosure proceedings have begun, so these situations are not covered by the new policy.  Since offers on houses in a short sale situation can take months to get a response back from the lender(s), it seems critical to me and my buyers that this information is clearly disclosed upfront… often my buyers have no time or no interest to wait around for 60-75 days for a 50/50 chance of a “yes.”  Since banks do not give a seller direction ahead of time on what price they’re willing to accept, the list price chosen by the seller and any offers submitted

Houses that are Lender Owned
Since the new RMLS policy takes into account only those houses that are in the foreclosure process, once the house is lender owned (also known as bank owned or REO), there would be no disclosure of it in this new field.  While responses from sellers of REOs are quicker, they can still take a week and come with 10-15 pages of “AS-IS” addendums, basically eliminating most disclosures and protections for the buyer and overriding most of the contract language that is used on the standard purchase agreement forms in Minnesota.  As such, some buyers have no interest in these properties and many others specifically want these properties since they can typically be purchased for substantial discounts to market value.

Considering that a little more than 1 in 4 of the sales occurring in the Twin Cities today is a foreclosure or short sale, it seems crucial to me that we have the best information possible on these properties and that they are easily searchable and reportable.  The current policy that the RMLS is implementing is akin to have a way to search for “one story” homes but not “two story” or “split level” homes.

Instead of the current policy, here’s my suggested solution:

Two fields on the RMLS:

Short Sale Subject to Lender Approval (with options of Prior to Sheriff’s Sale and Post Sheriff’s Sale)
These properties require the approval of the purchase agreement by the homeowner (easy to get) AND the lender (not as easy to get).

Lender Owned
These properties are repossessed by the lender via foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure and the lender/bank is the only decision maker.

This would address all the properties in some stage of lender mediation and would make disclosures clearer to buyers and market data for all users of the MLS that much more reliable.

I’d love to hear thoughts from the public… please leave comments below.

Short Sales & Foreclosures in Plymouth and Maple Grove

I took a few hours Sunday to review short sale and foreclosure sales in Plymouth and Maple Grove during the last 10 months and found some interesting information.  Before I explain what I found, I want to explain what I looked at:

  • Homes that were clearly a short sale OR a foreclosed, bank owned home.  This meant I only searched the terms like “short sale” and “bank owned” or “REO” and not all the other terms that can sometimes be ambiguous.   This gave me a short list to work from, but it was as close to perfect accuracy as could be hoped for.
  • I looked back through 10 months of sales
  • The only sales I considered for comparison were where the home was previously purchased since 2004 and previously sold for more than it did this time.  This assures that I’m actually looking at home sales that are able to give me a measurable change from sale to sale.

What I found was quite intriguing but given the lower incidence of foreclosures and short sales in these communities and the very short list of terms I was using, this is based off of 31 confirmed sales, it will have some margin of error:

  • Short sales sold on average for 16.4% less than they were purchased for by the most recent homeowner.
  • Foreclosed homes sold for 23.4% less than they were purchased for by the most recent homeowner.
  • Consequently, it can be seen that banks are well-served by selling homes via short sale in lieu of acquiring the properties through the foreclosure process… to the tune of 7% higher average sales prices AND thousands less in legal fees and holding costs.
  • Since this is an apples-to-apples comparison of specific sales, this isn’t a generalization of data.

Each community has different dynamics in them and I picked on Plymouth and Maple Grove for their similarities in housing and location.  The numbers will be different in other communities but I think you’ll find the same trend: short sale listings sell for more of their original value than foreclosure listings.  They do this because most of the time a short sale is in better physical condition and better maintained (since there is still an active owner) than foreclosure properties.  Further, things like a completed Sellers Disclosure and working utilities help put a buyer’s concerns at ease and therefore they’re willing to pay more for a better product.

Aaron Dickinson and MAAR Publish Report on Foreclosures and Short Sales on Twin Cities MLS

You can find the report here.

Background

In late October I wrote a blog post regarding foreclosures and short sales listed on the MLS in the Twin Cities. Once I started researching this topic, I found that the information I was uncovering was previously unknown in our market and that the trends it offered were very insightful. I shared this first-step research with Jeff Allen from MAAR and we decided to work together to explore it further.

The hardest part of this whole research project was developing the methodology & technique used to compile the appropriate data. Our local MLS does not have specific flags for foreclosures or short sales, so agents place myriad varieties of disclosures in the Agent, Public and Financial remarks. What’s worse, there’s no way to query all 3 fields at the same time so all the sold data had to be exported to an Access Database and queries run against that. We also had to come up with the appropriate terms. I provided Jeff a list of keywords I’ve seen used, which were then cross-checked to determine if they were reliable list of phrases. Because phrases like: “subject to bank approval” could mean a short sale or a bank owned property, we were unable to split up the data into “short sale” and “bank owned” categories.

After we had extracted the relevant properties, the next task was analyzing the data to determine what trends were evident and how they could be useful to the REALTOR membership as well as the public at large. Once we compiled these reports, we then had to submit our findings and report proposal to the MAAR Board of Directors for approval. Once we received that approval, we spent the last few weeks putting final polish on the report.

As mentioned before, here is the report. Tip of the hat to Jeff Allen @ MAAR for the excellent write-up of the analysis and to the MAAR Marketing Department for polishing up the report into something visually attractive.



Equal Housing Opportunity and REALTOR logo

TwinCitiesRealEstateBlog.com is not a Multiple Listing Service MLS, nor does it offer MLS access.
This website is a service of Aaron Dickinson of Edina Realty, a broker Participant of the Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota, Inc.